Archive for the ‘theory/criticism’ Category

“All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players;” – Shakespeare

"B.A. Ches" by Marta Ares & Susana Barberá

Last week I found myself on the west end and ducked into the Chelsea Art Museum for a cool respite and to see some refreshing perspectives on the urban chaos outside. The new “Streetwise” video art exhibition reflects Shakespeare’s sentiments very well with over a dozen short pieces that depict the drama of “the streets” and the complex interactions that occur there.

The streets represent both liberation and the hazards of life. From dog poop to crime, we  create elegant ways of moving around obstacles and intractable social problems. This mutability is illustrated to lovely effect in Marta Ares and Susana Barberá’s B.A. Ches where a tango couple dances around pot holes, mud and trash in the streets of Bueno Aires.

"Bandits" by Tiong Ang

The various faces of traffic are shown in Tiong Ang’s Bandits as Thai motorcylists are depicted in close-up wearing bandanas to battle the smog. Their covered faces and the loud roar of engines gives them a menacing look, like a pack of outlaws waiting to entrap innocent wayfarers. In III Crossing, June Bum Park uses her hand in front of the camera while shooting a busy intersection below her to give the effect of corralling pedestrians. Park’s simple technique seems to reveal the “invisible hand of god” pulling the strings of the tiny ant people below.

The friction between performance artists and unwitting pedestrians is also endlessly fascinating to observe. In Halil Altindere’s Miss Turkey, various performers try to disrupt the flow of traffic in outlandish ways, from a volley ball team that sets up a net across a busy street at every red light, to a bride in a wedding dress walking through a mall with a gun in her hand and a three piece marching band behind her. We see almost no interest from passersby to these various stunts, and this is particularly disturbing when a masked gunman lurks around a doorway waiting for someone to come out. Scores of pedestrians walked by him, impervious to the impending violence.

Miyata Jiro: Business in Rio de Janeiro

Interestingly, it seems that non-living performance artists get more attention than their human counterparts. In Miyata Jiro: Business in Rio de Janiero by Momoyo Torimitsu, a robot that looks like an aging Japanese business man crawls through the streets attended by a Japanese woman in a nurse’s uniform. The sight of this crawling robot startles people wherever he goes — in poor favelas and up-scale business districts alike. I was left wondering why this robot elicits more feeling and concern from people than a real person would. Perhaps his artificiality helps people take down their guards, and indulge in feelings of curiosity and compassion.

Watching these witty and poignant videos also allowed me to let down my defenses for a bit and reflect on the outside world. When I reemerged into the hot, sticky streets I felt cooler and more even-tempered than before. I was able to see beauty in the flow of life around me and dance around the pot holes with a light step and an open heart.

The traditional dance company model is exploding apart and a hybrid chimera is being born out of its ashes. These new dance companies are really production companies made up of interdisciplinary collaborators that do it all from making high end videos to performance pieces to working for fashion photographers, music artists, and ad agencies. But most of all this new dance company model lives and breathes on the internet through tweets, blogs, photo streams and video channels that keep an active community of fans, followers and audience members engaged and excited for more.

Here are two new dance companies based in Brooklyn that are at the cutting edge of this emerging paradigm.

DANCELEN(D)S is a non-profit production company that specializes in dance film. Artistic Director Jennifer Madison heads up a collective of artists to create movement-based films and documentaries as well as provide creative services for commercial productions.

“manoeuvres” by DANCELEN(D)S, featuring Valentine Norton’s Project Valentine Dance Crew

Indelible Dance Company calls itself “a dance company in HD.” Mysterious and bold, their website is simply a page of their videos and photos to date. What is so innovative is not the quantity of their output, but the quality of what they make. Each video and photo project is exquisitely wrought, finely composed and emits sexy, smart, classiness.

“Check Out My Leggings” by Indelible Dance

Each of these companies has embraced collaboration at the core of their creative process, and they go for the best collaborators they can find. Thus DANCELEN(D)S created a video look book for fashion designer Rachel Roy in which dancers move in clothing from her new collection, and Indelible Dance created an entire evening length performance around a design concept by Mary Huang to create sound-sensitive costumes made of light to portray the Big Bang Theory.

For the longest time, only a handful of dance companies embraced technology and collaboration in such a fundamental way. To do so required huge sums of money or technical wizardry make your own gear, such as Troika Ranch’s Isadora software that enabled dancers to trigger sound and video with their muscles. Today high-end photography and video is cheap to make and can be distributed all around the world for free on the internet. Fundraising sites such as Kickstarter allow artists to find and cultivate supporters beyond their personal networks and capture many microdonations to reach their large financial goals. New generations of dancers who grew up with these tools have entered the field and they are beginning to show us how dance will evolve in the 21st Century. What is most surprising about their revelations is that dance may be naturally dying off as a separate and distinguishable art form, instead it is merging with everything else into one interconnected web of creative life.

To learn about more artists and companies embracing this new model check out:

Dance-tech.net

Dance On Camera on Vimeo

After so much hype, I finally got to see the first season of The LXD – Jon M. Chu’s dance-based Action web series.

I’ve been intrigued by this project since I saw Chu’s call for dancers on YouTube a year and a half ago. He’s really got a vision of making dance action films that resonate in today’s era of social media. The back-story behind the project is almost more interesting than the plot line itself. A film director gets assigned to make a sequel to a Hollywood dance movie – Step Up 2: The Streets. While making this movie he falls in love with dance, specifically the skill involved in hip hop and street dance. This becomes the genesis for The LXD – an X-Men like legion of dance superheroes. To execute his new project, he took a completely modern approach. Instead of creating a feature length movie, he planned it out as a series of 10 min “webisodes” that would premiere online and later be consolidated into one “movie” for distribution on Netflix and DVD. Chu found his cast of dancers by putting out open calls on YouTube for dance audition videos. Then he built up a ton of hype for the series by creating hugely popular Twitter and Facebook pages, and added to that with a bunch of live appearances at big media events such as the Oscars, So You Think You Can Dance, and the TED conference.

From a marketing standpoint alone, I am very impressed by Jon M. Chu and the attention he has garnered for his project. Now what about the dance filmmaking itself?

I don’t think it is productive to rate The LXD based on originality. If you’ve seen as many dance films as I have, nothing in this series is groundbreaking in its approach to film and dance. What I was hoping for was a harmonious balance between dance, framing, plot line, and rhythm and he surpassed my expectations on most of these counts. The dancers are truly extraordinary, the camera movement and framing adds to the dynamism of the choreography, and the music and the editing came together in surprisingly artful ways. The weakest element by far is the plot line and the acting. Telling a story through dance is very difficult if you want it to seem “naturalistic” and believable as Chu’s Hollywood film background seems to lead. The problem is that dance is a poetic art form – using gesture, metaphor and symbolism to tell a story. When you try to add words, or worse yet, ask dancers to deliver lines, you run into dangerous territory. At best this Hollywood narrative approach makes The LXD series seem a bit clunky and cheesy, and at worse it detracts from the enjoyment of truly great dancing.

Thanks to the mini-series format of The LXD, Chu was able to play around with his approaches and switched it up a bit. In ten chapters you can see as many ways to tell a story through dance film: from silent film to split frames, and from web video to action film. My favorite episode was Chapter 3: Robot Lovestory with Madd Chadd, a pop-locking wizard whose robotic moves truly seem to defy humanness. Chu styled this episode after early silent films with dramatic music, jump cuts and short texts that appear as dialogue. The zany jump cuts across time and spaces keep the viewer sniffing for the narrative trail. Rather than hitting us over the head with the story we become detectives feeling our way around just like the main character who wakes up suddenly in the hospital with no memory of what happened to him.

Another notable episode for dance filmmakers is Chapter 9: Fanboyz which is basically a well-made instructional video on how to make great dance films. A vlogger, Cole Waters cracks the code to the initiation process to the LXD and posts his findings for all would-be members. He says if you want get picked up by The LXD (ie get your dance films noticed!) then you must:
1. Master a style of dance
2. Post it online (remember to use the space and your surroundings!)
3. Show a unique style
4. Be patient

That about says it all!

Season 2 is now playing on Hulu and this time we get to know the villains! Should be juicy. I’m staying tuned…

Lately, with the success of So You Think You Can Dance we’ve seen a resurgence of dance in main stream media. Now there is also emerging a progressive vision for dance in the internet age. Film director John M. Chu cut his teeth on the blockbuster hit: “Step Up 2: The Streets.” Today he is working on an interactive web series featuring “The League of eXtraordinary Dancers” (LXD), a band of hip hop dancers with “supernatural” abilities that battle it out over broadband. Everything about this project is Web 2.0. First Chu posted video announcements on YouTube asking dancers to respond with their audition videos. From the hundreds of video responses he received, he selected his cast, to make an interactive web series. So far they have been doing an impressive PR circuit. The LXD dancers have made appearances on SYTYCD, the Oscars, and TED. If this blows up, it could mean dance gains a strong foothold in the future of media. Below is their recent TEDtalk. I love what Chu says about how dance is flourishing and evolving through exchange on the internet. My hope is that the concert dance community takes some tips from these hip hop dancers and take to the digital streets!

Enjoy!

For her Kinetic Cinema program, LIQUID FILMS, cinedance pioneer, Amy Greenfield, takes dance into the water in a splash of amazing classic and neo cine-dance from 1903 to the 21st century, to transform the very nature of dance as only a screen medium can. Anna Brady Nuse interviewed Amy to find out why this theme, “Liquid”  excites her:

Liquid is sexy and always in motion and catches the light. It dances. And I found over the years so many liquid cinedances I love and feel connected to because of my own film “Tides”. And I thought how great it would be to see them all flow together.

Tides

They break boundaries which I feel still need to be broken in the field – there’s no way you can take dance and a camera into the water and not have kinetic cinema. And the definition of dance itself changes, becomes re-united with natural movement and at the same time transformed in the liquid flow, breaking totally with a tradition of dance vocabulary. All of these qualities are wonderful for cinematic material – they deal with color and light in relation to the body in motion on a cinematic level – a dynamic, unpredictable flow for both dance and camera. I feel that too much screen dance is static, and flat and unaware of the essence of cinema, which is light in motion, and how it can replace the third dimension with a transposed heightened plasticity.

“Nymph Of The Waves” was one of the first liquid cinedances, and is now an early film classic, and was perhaps the first use of a superimposition in the history of cinema. The connection was made right at the beginning, because it was a natural fit. One of Isadora Duncan’s great sources of inspiration was the movement of the ocean, but only with cinema could dance and the rhythms and motion and world of water come together and be communicated.

Your program spans the entire history of cinema. How have technological changes affected filmmakers’ treatment of this subject – water and the moving body?

To me what’s marvelous is what we do with the technology we have. Technology itself changes the kinds of films we can make but not the quality.

Yet it’s wonderful that now an individual filmmaker can successfully shoot with a light portable video camera of high enough quality underwater for a not staggering price tag. When Reifenstahl made the diving sequence from “Olympia” she had to invent technology to shoot it – gigantic cameras with a gigantic crew. But here are underwater dance films being made one-on-one, and we feel the intimacy, as in “Rapt”. And Elle Burchill can be the filmmaker and underwater dancer herself, an autobiographic cinedance. And Ben Dolphin shoots digitally with the high speed Phantom camera which can create slower than slow motion, a camera he uses for shooting TV commercials, here used for an experimental, personal cinedance.

In your film, “Tides”, the choreography of the camera is as integrated as the movement of the body being filmed. How did you direct this duet and then shape it in the editing?

I’d worked with Hilary Harris before in my film “Element” which is the mate to “Tides”. By the time we made “Tides” we almost communicated by osmosis, because we had “Element” as a basis. In “Tides” I wanted him with the Lo Cam handheld, actually standing in the waves himself, experiencing the same movement I was subjected to. And unless the film ran out or I ran out of steam we couldn’t stop, so the communion could build. The physical set-up worked in relation to communicating some key kinetic concepts: the extreme slow-motion, the movement of the camera in flow and counterflow to the human motion, and never losing the essential kinetic point of tension, where the body and ocean met. After the first shoot, looking at and discussing the film rushes became paramount -my pointing out “I want more of that, but more like this” or “I don’t want that” etc. Sometimes I directed with my hands – one hand the human motion, the other hand the camera motion, moving the hands as I wanted the two to symbiotically relate. This sense came from the fact that I had a film image going on on automatic inside my head while I was performing. So when I saw some kind of correspondence in the actual footage to that imaginary ideal film, that’d be great. While Hilary could never be inside my head, sometimes he came close.

The artists on your program represent a great range of filmmaking styles and approaches. Which are most like yours and which are the most different? Have any had an effect on your filmmaking? How?

All the films on the program are different, yet united by the maker truly wedding the surge and flow and weightless state and viscosity to how the camera moves in relation to the mover moving through the water. In that sense I feel a commonness with all the films. I feel close to the daring to expose the nude body in Sara Joel and Jody Oberfelder’s “Rapt”, the kinetic tension combined with slow motion in Ben Dolphin’s “Arising”, the film-maker herself in a journey in the water in “Mother/Daughter”, and when I saw “Immersion” several years ago I felt I wished I could have made a film something like it and felt I’d show it some day.

Arising

But the film-makers which have had the greatest affect on my film-making are Maya Deren and Kenneth Anger. Not Deren’s “Study In Choreography For Camera” except for the editing, but the beginning of “At Land”, which had such a direct influence on “Tides”, “Meshes Of The Afternoon” and “Ritual in Transfigured Time” for so many reasons, including the always inner drama coming from the silent language of movement, the border between metaphoric and real, natural movement and unnatural states, the woman’s silent journey, the strictness of structure, the mystery, the intensity. And her writing on film and dance. Kenneth keeps a great deal of this but does away with psychodrama. I hadn’t seen most of his work when I made a lot of my films but I know I was influenced by “osmosis”. He’s so powerful. Mystery and simplicity and the ‘dance’ totally part of the fabric of the film, and between the cuts, everything so cinematically visual/visionary, yet corresponding to some unknown invisible world and force. “Eaux D’Artifice” is a masterpiece. “Tides” was also influenced by Reifenstahl’s Diving Sequence from “Olympia”: the sculptural athleticism of the camera, the off axis turn of the camera, the dramatic point of intersection of body and water, the use of slow motion.

Coming up next at Kinetic Cinema:

Liquid Films

Curated by Amy Greenfield

Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 7:30pm

Tickets: $10

Reservations: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/87612

Films include: “Nymph Of the Waves“, by American Mutoscope and Biograph, one of the first dance films ever made, superimposes the dancer with the ocean waves, as well as Amy Greenfield’s primal “Tides”, with Greenfield and camera operator, Hilary Harris, both braving the ocean tides in their symbiotic camera dance. Kenneth Anger’s restored “Eaux D’Artifice”, with his “Water Witch” in the Tivoli fountain, is one of the great classics of the American avant-garde, and Ben Dolphin’s “Arising” has us flying joyfully with his dancers inside a waterfall, blurring an artificial screen world and the natural world. Jodi Kaplan’s “Immersion”, Jody Oberfelder and Sara Joel’s “Rapt”, Elle Burchill’s “Mother Daughter” and Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof’s “Pulsion” all made recently, are original, daring, entrancing, lyrically beautiful new cine-dances envisioning women moving in real underwater worlds.