<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Move The Frame &#187; definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pentacleblogs.org/movetheframe/tag/definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pentacleblogs.org/movetheframe</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What&#039;s in a name?</title>
		<link>http://pentacleblogs.org/movetheframe/2007/09/whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://pentacleblogs.org/movetheframe/2007/09/whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pentacleblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinedance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kinodance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screendance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videodance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movetheframe.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/whats-in-a-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I figured for my first entry I should tackle the biggest question looming over the art form of dance for the camera today, and that is: what should it be called?&#160; 
There are so many names being batted around: screendance, dance film, cinedance, kinodance, videodance, media dance. I&#8217;m sure there are more I don&#8217;t even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="mirror-camera_350x344.jpg" src="http://greatdance.com/movetheframe/images/mirror-camera_350x344.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float:left;margin:0 20px 20px 0;" height="344" width="350" /></span></div>
<p>I figured for my first entry I should tackle the biggest question looming over the art form of dance for the camera today, and that is: what should it be called?&nbsp; </p>
<p>There are so many names being batted around: screendance, dance film, cinedance, kinodance, videodance, media dance. I&#8217;m sure there are more I don&#8217;t even know. Each one has its merits and problems. Each one is has its staunch following of supporters and naysayers.</p>
<p>But what is important about having a name? Everyone is always complaining about being pigeon-holed, mislabeled, stuck in a category. Isn&#8217;t one of the great things about this art form that it&#8217;s still emerging and being defined? Practitioners in the field now are like pioneers on the new frontier. As my friend Matt Cook, a Milwaukee-based poet says: &#8220;It was easy to write the Great American Novel when there were only 5 American Novels.&#8221; How exciting to be on the vanguard of a wave that hasn&#8217;t crested yet!</p>
<p><span id="more-12"></span><br />
However there are huge downsides to not having a recognizable<br />
name for what you do. As any marketer will tell you, it&#8217;s all about<br />
branding. How can your movement grow if it&#8217;s lost in obscurity? People<br />
need a sound bite, a hook that they recognize and can grab hold of. As<br />
artists, we need an audience! And to attract a following we need a name<br />
for our craft. Successive generations may groan and complain about it<br />
forever, but without the name they wouldn&#8217;t have a job in the first<br />
place.</p>
<p>So what should it be? Obviously this question will not be<br />
answered in this entry. I have my preference for the term &#8220;videodance,&#8221;<br />
but I know that eventually I will have to concede to the popular<br />
winner. The winner will not be decided by any one person, but by the<br />
audience and market forces. Some day soon someone is going to figure<br />
out how to market this genre, and whichever name they can sell, will be<br />
the one we have to use.</p>
<p>So, let the games begin! Post your<br />
nominations here for the best name for this genre. Give us your<br />
surefire pitch, and in a few months, once this blog has blown-up, we&#8217;ll<br />
have a vote. So start campaigning now!</p>
<p>(PS: for an interesting discussion of this topic check out Karen Pearlman&#8217;s 2006 essay &#8220;A Dance of Definitions&#8221; <a href="http://www.realtimearts.net/article/issue74/8164">http://www.realtimearts.net/article/issue74/8164</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pentacleblogs.org/movetheframe/2007/09/whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
